Design¶
Execution Model and Data Structures¶
The monitoring-related information including the monitoring request
specification and DAMON-based operation schemes are stored in a data structure
called DAMON context. DAMON executes each context with a kernel thread
called kdamond. Multiple kdamonds could run in parallel, for different
types of monitoring.
To know how user-space can do the configurations and start/stop DAMON, refer to DAMON sysfs interface documentation.
Overall Architecture¶
DAMON subsystem is configured with three layers including
Operations Set: Implements fundamental operations for DAMON that depends on the given monitoring target address-space and available set of software/hardware primitives,
Core: Implements core logics including monitoring overhead/accuracy control and access-aware system operations on top of the operations set layer, and
Modules: Implements kernel modules for various purposes that provides interfaces for the user space, on top of the core layer.
Operations Set Layer¶
For data access monitoring and additional low level work, DAMON needs a set of implementations for specific operations that are dependent on and optimized for the given target address space. For example, below two operations for access monitoring are address-space dependent.
Identification of the monitoring target address range for the address space.
Access check of specific address range in the target space.
DAMON consolidates these implementations in a layer called DAMON Operations Set, and defines the interface between it and the upper layer. The upper layer is dedicated for DAMON’s core logics including the mechanism for control of the monitoring accruracy and the overhead.
Hence, DAMON can easily be extended for any address space and/or available hardware features by configuring the core logic to use the appropriate operations set. If there is no available operations set for a given purpose, a new operations set can be implemented following the interface between the layers.
For example, physical memory, virtual memory, swap space, those for specific processes, NUMA nodes, files, and backing memory devices would be supportable. Also, if some architectures or devices support special optimized access check features, those will be easily configurable.
DAMON currently provides below three operation sets. Below two subsections describe how those work.
vaddr: Monitor virtual address spaces of specific processes
fvaddr: Monitor fixed virtual address ranges
paddr: Monitor the physical address space of the system
To know how user-space can do the configuration via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to operations file part of the documentation.
VMA-based Target Address Range Construction¶
A mechanism of vaddr DAMON operations set that automatically initializes
and updates the monitoring target address regions so that entire memory
mappings of the target processes can be covered.
This mechanism is only for the vaddr operations set. In cases of
fvaddr and paddr operation sets, users are asked to manually set the
monitoring target address ranges.
Only small parts in the super-huge virtual address space of the processes are mapped to the physical memory and accessed. Thus, tracking the unmapped address regions is just wasteful. However, because DAMON can deal with some level of noise using the adaptive regions adjustment mechanism, tracking every mapping is not strictly required but could even incur a high overhead in some cases. That said, too huge unmapped areas inside the monitoring target should be removed to not take the time for the adaptive mechanism.
For the reason, this implementation converts the complex mappings to three distinct regions that cover every mapped area of the address space. The two gaps between the three regions are the two biggest unmapped areas in the given address space. The two biggest unmapped areas would be the gap between the heap and the uppermost mmap()-ed region, and the gap between the lowermost mmap()-ed region and the stack in most of the cases. Because these gaps are exceptionally huge in usual address spaces, excluding these will be sufficient to make a reasonable trade-off. Below shows this in detail:
<heap>
<BIG UNMAPPED REGION 1>
<uppermost mmap()-ed region>
(small mmap()-ed regions and munmap()-ed regions)
<lowermost mmap()-ed region>
<BIG UNMAPPED REGION 2>
<stack>
PTE Accessed-bit Based Access Check¶
Both of the implementations for physical and virtual address spaces use PTE
Accessed-bit for basic access checks. Only one difference is the way of
finding the relevant PTE Accessed bit(s) from the address. While the
implementation for the virtual address walks the page table for the target task
of the address, the implementation for the physical address walks every page
table having a mapping to the address. In this way, the implementations find
and clear the bit(s) for next sampling target address and checks whether the
bit(s) set again after one sampling period. This could disturb other kernel
subsystems using the Accessed bits, namely Idle page tracking and the reclaim
logic. DAMON does nothing to avoid disturbing Idle page tracking, so handling
the interference is the responsibility of sysadmins. However, it solves the
conflict with the reclaim logic using PG_idle and PG_young page flags,
as Idle page tracking does.
Core Logics¶
Monitoring¶
Below four sections describe each of the DAMON core mechanisms and the five
monitoring attributes, sampling interval, aggregation interval,
update interval, minimum number of regions, and maximum number of
regions.
To know how user-space can set the attributes via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to monitoring_attrs part of the documentation.
Access Frequency Monitoring¶
The output of DAMON says what pages are how frequently accessed for a given
duration. The resolution of the access frequency is controlled by setting
sampling interval and aggregation interval. In detail, DAMON checks
access to each page per sampling interval and aggregates the results. In
other words, counts the number of the accesses to each page. After each
aggregation interval passes, DAMON calls callback functions that previously
registered by users so that users can read the aggregated results and then
clears the results. This can be described in below simple pseudo-code:
while monitoring_on:
for page in monitoring_target:
if accessed(page):
nr_accesses[page] += 1
if time() % aggregation_interval == 0:
for callback in user_registered_callbacks:
callback(monitoring_target, nr_accesses)
for page in monitoring_target:
nr_accesses[page] = 0
sleep(sampling interval)
The monitoring overhead of this mechanism will arbitrarily increase as the size of the target workload grows.
Region Based Sampling¶
To avoid the unbounded increase of the overhead, DAMON groups adjacent pages
that assumed to have the same access frequencies into a region. As long as the
assumption (pages in a region have the same access frequencies) is kept, only
one page in the region is required to be checked. Thus, for each sampling
interval, DAMON randomly picks one page in each region, waits for one
sampling interval, checks whether the page is accessed meanwhile, and
increases the access frequency counter of the region if so. The counter is
called nr_accesses of the region. Therefore, the monitoring overhead is
controllable by setting the number of regions. DAMON allows users to set the
minimum and the maximum number of regions for the trade-off.
This scheme, however, cannot preserve the quality of the output if the assumption is not guaranteed.
Adaptive Regions Adjustment¶
Even somehow the initial monitoring target regions are well constructed to fulfill the assumption (pages in same region have similar access frequencies), the data access pattern can be dynamically changed. This will result in low monitoring quality. To keep the assumption as much as possible, DAMON adaptively merges and splits each region based on their access frequency.
For each aggregation interval, it compares the access frequencies
(nr_accesses) of adjacent regions. If the difference is small, and if the
sum of the two regions’ sizes is smaller than the size of total regions divided
by the minimum number of regions, DAMON merges the two regions. If the
resulting number of total regions is still higher than maximum number of
regions, it repeats the merging with increasing access frequenceis difference
threshold until the upper-limit of the number of regions is met, or the
threshold becomes higher than possible maximum value (aggregation interval
divided by sampling interval). Then, after it reports and clears the
aggregated access frequency of each region, it splits each region into two or
three regions if the total number of regions will not exceed the user-specified
maximum number of regions after the split.
In this way, DAMON provides its best-effort quality and minimal overhead while keeping the bounds users set for their trade-off.
Age Tracking¶
By analyzing the monitoring results, users can also find how long the current
access pattern of a region has maintained. That could be used for good
understanding of the access pattern. For example, page placement algorithm
utilizing both the frequency and the recency could be implemented using that.
To make such access pattern maintained period analysis easier, DAMON maintains
yet another counter called age in each region. For each aggregation
interval, DAMON checks if the region’s size and access frequency
(nr_accesses) has significantly changed. If so, the counter is reset to
zero. Otherwise, the counter is increased.
Dynamic Target Space Updates Handling¶
The monitoring target address range could dynamically changed. For example, virtual memory could be dynamically mapped and unmapped. Physical memory could be hot-plugged.
As the changes could be quite frequent in some cases, DAMON allows the
monitoring operations to check dynamic changes including memory mapping changes
and applies it to monitoring operations-related data structures such as the
abstracted monitoring target memory area only for each of a user-specified time
interval (update interval).
User-space can get the monitoring results via DAMON sysfs interface and/or tracepoints. For more details, please refer to the documentations for DAMOS tried regions and Tracepoints for Monitoring Results, respectively.
Operation Schemes¶
One common purpose of data access monitoring is access-aware system efficiency optimizations. For example,
paging out memory regions that are not accessed for more than two minutes
or
using THP for memory regions that are larger than 2 MiB and showing a high access frequency for more than one minute.
One straightforward approach for such schemes would be profile-guided optimizations. That is, getting data access monitoring results of the workloads or the system using DAMON, finding memory regions of special characteristics by profiling the monitoring results, and making system operation changes for the regions. The changes could be made by modifying or providing advice to the software (the application and/or the kernel), or reconfiguring the hardware. Both offline and online approaches could be available.
Among those, providing advice to the kernel at runtime would be flexible and effective, and therefore widely be used. However, implementing such schemes could impose unnecessary redundancy and inefficiency. The profiling could be redundant if the type of interest is common. Exchanging the information including monitoring results and operation advice between kernel and user spaces could be inefficient.
To allow users to reduce such redundancy and inefficiencies by offloading the
works, DAMON provides a feature called Data Access Monitoring-based Operation
Schemes (DAMOS). It lets users specify their desired schemes at a high
level. For such specifications, DAMON starts monitoring, finds regions having
the access pattern of interest, and applies the user-desired operation actions
to the regions, for every user-specified time interval called
apply_interval.
To know how user-space can set apply_interval via DAMON sysfs
interface, refer to apply_interval_us
part of the documentation.
Operation Action¶
The management action that the users desire to apply to the regions of their
interest. For example, paging out, prioritizing for next reclamation victim
selection, advising khugepaged to collapse or split, or doing nothing but
collecting statistics of the regions.
The list of supported actions is defined in DAMOS, but the implementation of each action is in the DAMON operations set layer because the implementation normally depends on the monitoring target address space. For example, the code for paging specific virtual address ranges out would be different from that for physical address ranges. And the monitoring operations implementation sets are not mandated to support all actions of the list. Hence, the availability of specific DAMOS action depends on what operations set is selected to be used together.
The list of the supported actions, their meaning, and DAMON operations sets that supports each action are as below.
willneed: Callmadvise()for the region withMADV_WILLNEED. Supported byvaddrandfvaddroperations set.
cold: Callmadvise()for the region withMADV_COLD. Supported byvaddrandfvaddroperations set.
pageout: Reclaim the region. Supported byvaddr,fvaddrandpaddroperations set.
hugepage: Callmadvise()for the region withMADV_HUGEPAGE. Supported byvaddrandfvaddroperations set.
nohugepage: Callmadvise()for the region withMADV_NOHUGEPAGE. Supported byvaddrandfvaddroperations set.
lru_prio: Prioritize the region on its LRU lists. Supported bypaddroperations set.
lru_deprio: Deprioritize the region on its LRU lists. Supported bypaddroperations set.
migrate_hot: Migrate the regions prioritizing warmer regions. Supported bypaddroperations set.
migrate_cold: Migrate the regions prioritizing colder regions. Supported bypaddroperations set.
stat: Do nothing but count the statistics. Supported by all operations sets.
Applying the actions except stat to a region is considered as changing the
region’s characteristics. Hence, DAMOS resets the age of regions when any such
actions are applied to those.
To know how user-space can set the action via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to action part of the documentation.
Target Access Pattern¶
The access pattern of the schemes’ interest. The patterns are constructed with the properties that DAMON’s monitoring results provide, specifically the size, the access frequency, and the age. Users can describe their access pattern of interest by setting minimum and maximum values of the three properties. If a region’s three properties are in the ranges, DAMOS classifies it as one of the regions that the scheme is having an interest in.
To know how user-space can set the access pattern via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to access_pattern part of the documentation.
Quotas¶
DAMOS upper-bound overhead control feature. DAMOS could incur high overhead if the target access pattern is not properly tuned. For example, if a huge memory region having the access pattern of interest is found, applying the scheme’s action to all pages of the huge region could consume unacceptably large system resources. Preventing such issues by tuning the access pattern could be challenging, especially if the access patterns of the workloads are highly dynamic.
To mitigate that situation, DAMOS provides an upper-bound overhead control feature called quotas. It lets users specify an upper limit of time that DAMOS can use for applying the action, and/or a maximum bytes of memory regions that the action can be applied within a user-specified time duration.
To know how user-space can set the basic quotas via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to quotas part of the documentation.
Prioritization¶
A mechanism for making a good decision under the quotas. When the action cannot be applied to all regions of interest due to the quotas, DAMOS prioritizes regions and applies the action to only regions having high enough priorities so that it will not exceed the quotas.
The prioritization mechanism should be different for each action. For example, rarely accessed (colder) memory regions would be prioritized for page-out scheme action. In contrast, the colder regions would be deprioritized for huge page collapse scheme action. Hence, the prioritization mechanisms for each action are implemented in each DAMON operations set, together with the actions.
Though the implementation is up to the DAMON operations set, it would be common
to calculate the priority using the access pattern properties of the regions.
Some users would want the mechanisms to be personalized for their specific
case. For example, some users would want the mechanism to weigh the recency
(age) more than the access frequency (nr_accesses). DAMOS allows users
to specify the weight of each access pattern property and passes the
information to the underlying mechanism. Nevertheless, how and even whether
the weight will be respected are up to the underlying prioritization mechanism
implementation.
To know how user-space can set the prioritization weights via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to weights part of the documentation.
Aim-oriented Feedback-driven Auto-tuning¶
Automatic feedback-driven quota tuning. Instead of setting the absolute quota value, users can specify the metric of their interest, and what target value they want the metric value to be. DAMOS then automatically tunes the aggressiveness (the quota) of the corresponding scheme. For example, if DAMOS is under achieving the goal, DAMOS automatically increases the quota. If DAMOS is over achieving the goal, it decreases the quota.
The goal can be specified with three parameters, namely target_metric,
target_value, and current_value. The auto-tuning mechanism tries to
make current_value of target_metric be same to target_value.
Currently, two target_metric are provided.
user_input: User-provided value. Users could use any metric that they has interest in for the value. Use space main workload’s latency or throughput, system metrics like free memory ratio or memory pressure stall time (PSI) could be examples. Note that users should explicitly setcurrent_valueon their own in this case. In other words, users should repeatedly provide the feedback.some_mem_psi_us: System-widesomememory pressure stall information in microseconds that measured from last quota reset to next quota reset. DAMOS does the measurement on its own, so onlytarget_valueneed to be set by users at the initial time. In other words, DAMOS does self-feedback.
To know how user-space can set the tuning goal metric, the target value, and/or the current value via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to quota goals part of the documentation.
Watermarks¶
Conditional DAMOS (de)activation automation. Users might want DAMOS to run only under certain situations. For example, when a sufficient amount of free memory is guaranteed, running a scheme for proactive reclamation would only consume unnecessary system resources. To avoid such consumption, the user would need to manually monitor some metrics such as free memory ratio, and turn DAMON/DAMOS on or off.
DAMOS allows users to offload such works using three watermarks. It allows the users to configure the metric of their interest, and three watermark values, namely high, middle, and low. If the value of the metric becomes above the high watermark or below the low watermark, the scheme is deactivated. If the metric becomes below the mid watermark but above the low watermark, the scheme is activated. If all schemes are deactivated by the watermarks, the monitoring is also deactivated. In this case, the DAMON worker thread only periodically checks the watermarks and therefore incurs nearly zero overhead.
To know how user-space can set the watermarks via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to watermarks part of the documentation.
Filters¶
Non-access pattern-based target memory regions filtering. If users run self-written programs or have good profiling tools, they could know something more than the kernel, such as future access patterns or some special requirements for specific types of memory. For example, some users may know only anonymous pages can impact their program’s performance. They can also have a list of latency-critical processes.
To let users optimize DAMOS schemes with such special knowledge, DAMOS provides a feature called DAMOS filters. The feature allows users to set an arbitrary number of filters for each scheme. Each filter specifies the type of target memory, and whether it should exclude the memory of the type (filter-out), or all except the memory of the type (filter-in).
For efficient handling of filters, some types of filters are handled by the core layer, while others are handled by operations set. In the latter case, hence, support of the filter types depends on the DAMON operations set. In case of the core layer-handled filters, the memory regions that excluded by the filter are not counted as the scheme has tried to the region. In contrast, if a memory regions is filtered by an operations set layer-handled filter, it is counted as the scheme has tried. This difference affects the statistics.
Below types of filters are currently supported.
- anonymous page
Applied to pages that containing data that not stored in files.
Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only
paddrset.
- memory cgroup
Applied to pages that belonging to a given cgroup.
Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only
paddrset.
- young page
Applied to pages that are accessed after the last access check from the scheme.
Handled by operations set layer. Supported by only
paddrset.
- address range
Applied to pages that belonging to a given address range.
Handled by the core logic.
- DAMON monitoring target
Applied to pages that belonging to a given DAMON monitoring target.
Handled by the core logic.
To know how user-space can set the watermarks via DAMON sysfs interface, refer to filters part of the documentation.
Application Programming Interface¶
The programming interface for kernel space data access-aware applications.
DAMON is a framework, so it does nothing by itself. Instead, it only helps
other kernel components such as subsystems and modules building their data
access-aware applications using DAMON’s core features. For this, DAMON exposes
its all features to other kernel components via its application programming
interface, namely include/linux/damon.h. Please refer to the API
document for details of the interface.
Modules¶
Because the core of DAMON is a framework for kernel components, it doesn’t provide any direct interface for the user space. Such interfaces should be implemented by each DAMON API user kernel components, instead. DAMON subsystem itself implements such DAMON API user modules, which are supposed to be used for general purpose DAMON control and special purpose data access-aware system operations, and provides stable application binary interfaces (ABI) for the user space. The user space can build their efficient data access-aware applications using the interfaces.
General Purpose User Interface Modules¶
DAMON modules that provide user space ABIs for general purpose DAMON usage in runtime.
DAMON user interface modules, namely ‘DAMON sysfs interface’ and ‘DAMON debugfs interface’ are DAMON API user kernel modules that provide ABIs to the user-space. Please note that DAMON debugfs interface is currently deprecated.
Like many other ABIs, the modules create files on sysfs and debugfs, allow users to specify their requests to and get the answers from DAMON by writing to and reading from the files. As a response to such I/O, DAMON user interface modules control DAMON and retrieve the results as user requested via the DAMON API, and return the results to the user-space.
The ABIs are designed to be used for user space applications development, rather than human beings’ fingers. Human users are recommended to use such user space tools. One such Python-written user space tool is available at Github (https://github.com/damonitor/damo), Pypi (https://pypistats.org/packages/damo), and Fedora (https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/python-damo/damo/).
Please refer to the ABI document for details of the interfaces.
Special-Purpose Access-aware Kernel Modules¶
DAMON modules that provide user space ABI for specific purpose DAMON usage.
DAMON sysfs/debugfs user interfaces are for full control of all DAMON features in runtime. For each special-purpose system-wide data access-aware system operations such as proactive reclamation or LRU lists balancing, the interfaces could be simplified by removing unnecessary knobs for the specific purpose, and extended for boot-time and even compile time control. Default values of DAMON control parameters for the usage would also need to be optimized for the purpose.
To support such cases, yet more DAMON API user kernel modules that provide more simple and optimized user space interfaces are available. Currently, two modules for proactive reclamation and LRU lists manipulation are provided. For more detail, please read the usage documents for those (DAMON-based Reclamation and DAMON-based LRU-lists Sorting).