13:43 sarbes: Hi. While running some piglet tests on Lima, I've noticed that GL_ARB_texture_storage is missing for the GLES context. What's weird to me is that the extension seems to be missing from the GLES headers, with only the EXT extension being available.
13:44 sarbes: Maybe I'm missing something, but the extension says that GLES is supported, so I would expect it to show up.
13:58 tom187: Hello! I've recently been having trouble with compiling mesa 26.2.0 with zink on non-aarch64 android targets. I was able to fix it by modifying dri_sym to change the tls symbols to emutls for those targets. Just wanted to ask if non-aarch64 android was tested in the mesa ci? I looked and don't see anything, so am asking just to be sure because am not familiar with gitlab ci. I want to submit this as an MR if it's not just me doing something wrong. Sorry if
13:58 tom187: [21:56] <tom187> this is the wrong place, the mesa README told me to ask here if I didn't know where
13:58 tom187: Hello! I've recently been having trouble with compiling mesa 26.2.0 with zink on non-aarch64 android targets. I was able to fix it by modifying dri_sym to change the tls symbols to emutls for those targets. Just wanted to ask if non-aarch64 android was tested in the mesa ci? I looked and don't see anything, so am asking just to be sure because am not familiar with gitlab ci. I want to submit this as an MR if it's not just me doing something wrong. Sorry if
13:58 tom187: [21:56] <tom187> this is the wrong place, the mesa README told me to ask here if I didn't know where
13:59 tom187: OH sorry! I sent that too many times
15:25 rodrigovivi: airlied: jani: another good reason for us to have a unified drm-for-linux-next ? https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/1f884bfe-f8be-45fe-97d6-a64547b1bf6d@sirena.org.uk/
18:55 HdkR: Did we not get a list of hotel recommendations for XDC this year on the site? I'll probably just be grabbing some random hotel heading towards the CN tower. But would be nice to have a recomendation list :D
20:00 rodrigovivi: jani: airlied: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools/-/merge_requests/110
20:28 airlied: agd5f: I think I'm going to have to insist on amd moving to dim
20:28 airlied: this round the conflict pile has been extra messy, and if we are going to feed a unified drm tree to next then I'd want amd in that
22:21 agd5f: airlied, ok. I assume I'll need to create a new drm-amd repo?