11:04 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org Simon Ser pushed a new branch no-real-name https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.freedesktop.org/tree/no-real-name
11:04 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org/no-real-name: Simon Ser * reviewing: drop "real name" mention https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.freedesktop.org/commit/0f5da0264667 reviewing.html
11:05 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org Merge request !66 opened by Simon Ser (emersion) reviewing: drop "real name" mention https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.freedesktop.org/-/merge_requests/66
11:05 pq: wrong remeote for push? :-)
11:05 emersion: er, wrong branch, oh well
13:15 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org/main: Simon Ser * reviewing: drop "real name" mention https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.freedesktop.org/commit/0f5da0264667 reviewing.html
13:15 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org Merge request !66 merged \o/ (reviewing: drop "real name" mention https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland.freedesktop.org/-/merge_requests/66)
13:15 wlb: wayland.freedesktop.org Simon Ser deleted branch no-real-name
14:31 wlb: wayland Merge request !344 opened by Simon Ser (emersion) protocol: refer to wl_surface.offset in wl_data_device.start_drag https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/merge_requests/344
14:34 wlb: wayland Merge request !345 opened by Simon Ser (emersion) protocol: document wl_surface.offset for sub-surfaces https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/merge_requests/345
14:35 wlb: wayland Merge request !346 opened by Simon Ser (emersion) protocol: document that wl_surface.offset is role-specific https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/merge_requests/346
15:34 wlb: weston Issue #829 opened by Marius Vlad (mvlad) wl_surface.offset interaction with subsurfaces https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/issues/829 [Core compositor]
15:51 wlb: wayland Issue #414 opened by Kirill Primak (vyivel) protocol: clarify how destroying and recreating a wl_subsurface affects its parent-child relationship and position https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/414
16:30 vyivel: are there any wayland test suites besides wlcs?
16:32 emersion: weston has one, probably others too, but somewhat tied to weston ofc
16:32 vyivel: hmm
16:33 vyivel: wlroots kinda needs one but maybe there's a way to avoid writing some of the tests
19:41 i509vcb: I get the feeling that applying wlcs to a library is a fools errand
19:41 i509vcb: wlcs should probably be used to test full implementations
23:48 RAOF: i509vcb: wlcs is part of our test suite for the Mir library :P
23:49 RAOF: But you're right, you also want to test full implementations.
23:50 i509vcb: Plus as wlroots you'd need to maintain a test compositor in tree, more than likely one which is a lot larger than tinywl
23:51 i509vcb: (Or out of tree at great pain)
23:54 RAOF: I'm not familiar with wlroots, but you don't need to be a big compositor to pass wlcs.
23:55 i509vcb: With pure xdg-shell and core protocols I imagine it would be quite easy
23:56 i509vcb: But once you start bringing in things like layer shell, all the wlr protocols to make things like screenshots work and etc you need a larger amount of coverage
23:56 i509vcb: (of course wlcs won't ever cover 100% of protocol testing)
23:56 RAOF: Right. And if tinywl doesn't support a protocol, wlcs won't test it on tinywl.
23:57 RAOF: If you don't expose layer shell, wlcs won't try to test it :)